![]() ![]() Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.183.29.48 ( talk) 21:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Do you have a verifiable reference that states that those who protest Scientology are NOT Anonymous? Because there are several reliable references that state that they ARE, and as such, the mention of Chanology is quite valid. Either merge the pages, or keep them separate. Thats why all information regarding Chanology should be kept on their separate page because they are not nameless, they're Chanologists. There is no homogenous (or even heterogenous) identity - merely namelessness. Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.183.29.48 ( talk) 06:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Anonymous doesn't get to choose who's in and who's not. ![]() That should be made clear in this article. Chanology was an just a schism of Anonymous and any information regarding the Scientology protests should be moved to the Chanology page.Īnonymous hates Chanology. I noticed the header for this article mostly makes reference to Chanology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |